_By Taofiq Kunle Sulaiman_

In every nation's history, there emerges a moment that separates political expediency from purposeful leadership, a juncture where tough decisions must be made, not for immediate applause but for lasting progress. President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s decision to end Nigeria’s decades-long fuel subsidy belongs firmly in that category.

This reform, often mischaracterized as an act of insensitivity, stands as one of the boldest economic decisions in Nigeria’s contemporary history. It is not a policy of punishment but a necessary correction, a courageous attempt to rescue an economy weakened by years of fiscal waste, corruption, and dependency.

For decades, the fuel subsidy was presented as a benevolent measure to shield citizens from hardship. In reality, it became a drainpipe through which trillions of naira were lost to fraudulent claims, opaque accounting, and elite profiteering. The supposed relief for the poor turned into a grand deception that enriched a few and impoverished the nation.

By the time President Tinubu assumed office in May 2023, the subsidy had grown into an unsustainable burden. The nation was borrowing to finance consumption while neglecting production. Continuation of the policy would have further plunged Nigeria into economic insolvency. The president was left with a clear choice, and that's to preserve political comfort or protect the country’s fiscal future. He chose the latter.

Much has been said about Tinubu’s criticism of subsidy removal during President Goodluck Jonathan’s administration in 2012. However, such comparisons ignore the vastly different contexts.

In 2012, there was deep mistrust in governance. The subsidy framework lacked transparency, and citizens had little confidence that the savings would be channeled into tangible development. Tinubu’s call then was not a rejection of reform, but an insistence on a structured, transparent, and people-oriented approach.

By 2023, the situation had evolved. The fiscal space was severely constrained, oil revenues had dwindled, and Nigeria was suffocating under debt. The economic conditions necessitated immediate and decisive action. Tinubu, now at the helm of affairs, had the responsibility to act not as an opposition figure seeking accountability, but as a leader charged with rescuing a fragile economy.

Unlike previous attempts, the current administration’s policy is not an isolated action but a coordinated economic restructuring. The removal of subsidy is being complemented by strategic interventions aimed at cushioning its impact and repositioning the economy for sustainable growth.

Among these interventions are Increased revenue allocation to states, enabling local governments to execute development projects with greater autonomy.

Palliative packages and social investment programmes designed to support vulnerable households.

Investment in public transportation, infrastructure, and agricultural productivity. and

Fiscal and monetary policy harmonization to stabilize the naira and attract foreign investment.


These steps collectively represent a deliberate transition from a consumption-based economy to one built on productivity and accountability.

Going forward, Governance demands realism, not romanticism. Maintaining fuel subsidy was equivalent to financing a national illusion, one that drained the treasury and hindered growth. Tinubu’s administration has opted for the path of truth and responsibility.

Short-term discomfort is inevitable, but it is a necessary price for long-term stability. Great nations are not built on avoidance of pain but on the endurance of reform. Tinubu’s decision signals a leadership philosophy grounded in courage, foresight, and integrity which are the hallmarks of transformative governance.

Though the full benefits of the reform will take time to mature, early indicators reveal its positive impact thus:

The federal and state treasuries are experiencing healthier inflows.

Investors’ confidence in Nigeria’s economy is gradually being restored.

The foreign exchange market is undergoing rationalization, a step towards genuine stability. and

Infrastructure investment and industrial policy are being prioritized to drive inclusive growth.


These are concrete signs that the reform is not mere austerity, but a recalibration of the economy’s foundation.

Leadership is often tested in times of unpopularity. Tinubu’s decision to remove fuel subsidy at the inception of his administration demonstrates political will rarely seen in the nation’s history. It reflects a deep understanding that economic transformation cannot occur under the weight of fiscal deception.

Criticism will abound, as is natural in a democracy, but history will record that when Nigeria’s survival demanded courage, Tinubu acted. He chose the country’s long-term stability over transient comfort.

The removal of fuel subsidy is not a burden for the president alone to bear, it is a collective responsibility. Citizens, state actors, and the private sector must align in purpose, recognizing that sustainable development requires sacrifice, productivity, and patience.

No nation ever attained greatness by clinging to economic illusions. Nigeria’s future depends on facing reality and reforming courageously, precisely what President Tinubu has done.

In a nutshell, when the dust of present discomfort settles and the economy stabilizes, posterity will acknowledge this moment as a turning point, when a leader chose truth over populism, action over rhetoric, and sustainability over sentiment.

Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s fuel subsidy reform is not an act of betrayal but a declaration of renewal. It marks the beginning of Nigeria’s journey toward fiscal discipline, economic sovereignty, and genuine development.

History, in its fairness, will not remember him as the tormentor of the poor, but as the president who dismantled a grand deception and redirected the nation toward a path of honest prosperity.

0 Comments